As a self-taught genealogist, everything I’ve learned, I
learned through trial and error in bits and pieces. Citing my sources became
more of a habit after learning about and reading Evidence Explained by Elizabeth Shown Mills. But analyzing sources?
Wasn’t I analyzing a document when I
decided if it belonged to my ancestor or not? I didn’t even know what I didn’t
know! So I decided to become a participant in a study group for the book, Mastering Genealogical Proof by Thomas
W. Jones.
In the last couple of years, I had been toying with the idea
of becoming a certified genealogist. For years, I’ve been dabbling in family
history research, but I began to realize my research was not up to professional
standards. This study group seemed like a good idea. Let me tell you, it’s
kicking my butt. I thought I
understood original and derivative records; primary and secondary information;
and direct and indirect evidence. Working through the exercises in this book has
shown me how little I understand these concepts. So, in order to keep them
front and center in my mind, I decided to blog about what I’m learning. These are not my ideas–they are the result
of knowledge gained through reading Mastering
Genealogical Proof by Thomas W. Jones.
One of the notions I’ve learned is the importance of framing
my research through appropriate questions. While I sort of had questions about
my ancestors like, “Who was Jacob’s father?” “Were these people his siblings?” “Where
was he living in 1880?” I never formally wrote them down. These kinds of
questions point me toward sources where I might find answers and information that
will lead to evidence. The questions need to be framed about a person whom I
already have known or “documented” information about and then ask questions
about their relationships, identity, and activities. The questions I’ve asked
about my ancestors seem right on target, but I don’t write them down or make
sure they are about a documented person.
The sources I consult are also an important part of my
research. Sources can be original (those created at the time of an event) or
derivative (those created based on other records). Original records are usually
more credible and the records I strive to find. A new thought for me was that
indexes and databases are not considered sources because they are finding aids
that help locate sources.
Sources contain information that is either primary (first-person
account) or secondary (hearsay). They can also be indeterminable which means I
have no idea who gave the information. Of course, I really want information
that is primary, but sometimes I have to settle for secondary. My
great-grandfather’s death certificate gives me primary information about his
death. Presumably his niece, who was the informant, handled the funeral
arrangements and knew about his death, as well as the physician who attended
him. But the birth information contained on that certificate is not primary
information because his niece wasn’t there when her uncle was born. She only
knew about it because he told her when to celebrate his birthday. And his death
certificate reflects that because she didn’t know exactly the year he was born
or how old he was. Even though this is secondary information, it does give me
clues about his birth and helps narrow my research field.
And then there is the evidence that is either direct, indirect,
or negative, which is where my research question comes into play. In the case
of my great-grandfather’s birth, his death certificate is an original record
that contains secondary information, but it directly answers the question of
when and where he was born, so it is direct evidence of his birth. Evidence is
not something I can touch or see; it is something I create in my mind based
upon my interpretation of the information in a source. What a new thought! In
the past, I would have considered my great-grandfather’s death certificate as
evidence.
So how will studying this chapter change my research? Well,
for starters, I’m going back to my grandparents and making sure I have all my
information backed up by actual original sources and not just the word of my
parents. I will begin with appropriate questions and start analyzing the
sources I have. As difficult as I’ve found this chapter, I’m excited to be
expanding my knowledge and applying it directly to my research. If you want to
bring your genealogy up a notch, I strongly encourage you to delve into this
book. It will change your research.
No comments:
Post a Comment